Close
Close Browser Alert
Browser Compatibility Notification
It appears you are trying to access this site using an outdated browser. As a result, parts of the site may not function properly for you. We recommend updating your browser to its most recent version at your earliest convenience.
  • Sectors
    Toggle Section
    • Energy & Resources
      Toggle Section
      • Mining
      • Oil & Gas
      • Power
    • Environment
    • Property & Buildings
      Toggle Section
      • Civic, Community and Justice
      • Commercial and Workplace
      • Defence and National Security
      • Education and Science
      • Healthcare and Wellbeing
      • Industrial, Resource and Utilities
      • Industrial, Resource and Utilities
      • Residential, Retirement and Aged Care
      • Retail and Hospitality
      • Transport Facilities
      • Urban Development
    • Transportation
    • Water
  • Projects
    Toggle Section
    • Project Search
  • Services
    Toggle Section
    • Advisory
      Toggle Section
      • Asset Management
      • Asset Management Systems
      • Asset Performance and Optimisation
      • Asset Operations
      • Assurance, Audit and Compliance
      • Business Case Development
      • Finance and Economic Analysis
      • Logistics and Infrastructure Policy
      • Regulation and Access
      • Risk Management
      • Transaction Advisory
    • Architecture and Design
    • Buildings
      Toggle Section
      • Asset and Facilities Management
      • Demolition and Decommissioning
      • Digital Design
      • Forensic Engineering
        Toggle Section
        • Accident Reconstruction
        • Building Sciences and Physics
        • Catastrophe Response
        • Construction Defect
        • Fire Investigations
        • Structural Forensics
        • Subsidence Investigations
      • Geotechnical
      • Instrumentation and Control
      • Land Development and Urban Planning
        Toggle Section
        • Land Development
        • Urban Planning
      • Materials, Process and Plant Engineering
        Toggle Section
        • Materials Handling
        • Minerals Processing
        • Plant Engineering
      • Mechanical, Electrical, Fire and Life Safety
        Toggle Section
        • Electrical Engineering - Building
        • Fire and Life Safety
        • HVAC
        • Hydraulics - Building
      • Project Management
        Toggle Section
        • Project and Construction Management
        • Stakeholder Engagement and Social Sustainability
      • Security, Information, Communication & Technology
        Toggle Section
        • Communication Systems
        • Security
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Structures
    • Digital
      Toggle Section
      • Cyber Security and Risk Management
      • Data and Analytics
      • Digital Strategy and Transformation
      • Digital Innovation
      • Smart Technology Solutions
    • Energy and Resources
      Toggle Section
      • Asset and Facilities Management
      • Chemicals
      • Dams
      • Emergency Response
      • Geology
      • Geotechnical
      • HSE Systems and Industrial Hygiene
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • Instrumentation and Control
      • Integrated Water Management
      • Materials, Process and Plant Engineering
        Toggle Section
        • Materials Handling
        • Minerals Processing
        • Plant Engineering
      • Materials Technology
      • Mechanical, Electrical, Fire and Life Safety
        Toggle Section
        • Electrical Engineering - Building
        • Fire and Life Safety
        • HVAC
        • Hydraulics - Building
      • Mining Engineering and Geosciences
      • Oil and Gas
      • Power
      • Project and Construction Management
      • Risk Management
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Stakeholder Engagement and Social Sustainability
      • Tailings (Mines and Residue)
      • Wastewater Treatment and Recycling
      • Tunnels
      • EPCM
    • Environmental
      Toggle Section
      • Air and Noise
      • Aquatic Sciences
      • Contamination Assessment and Remediation
      • Demolition and Decommissioning
      • Food and Agriculture
        Toggle Section
        • Agriculture
        • Food Processing
        • Forestry Management
      • HSE Systems and Industrial Hygiene
      • Hydrogeology
      • Hydrology and Hydrodynamics
        Toggle Section
        • Climate Change
        • Waterways and Coastal
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • Maritime and Coastal Engineering
      • Natural Resources
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Stakeholder Engagement and Social Sustainability
      • Waste Management
      • Environmental Strategy Consultation
      • International Development Assistance (IDA)
    • Geosciences
      Toggle Section
      • Contamination Assessment and Remediation
      • Dams
      • Geology
      • Geotechnical
        Toggle Section
        • Geotechnical laboratory testing
      • Hydrogeology
      • Mining Geosciences
      • Risk Management
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Tailings (Mines and Residue)
      • Tunnels
    • Project Management
      Toggle Section
      • Construction Contracting
      • EPCM
      • International Development Assistance (IDA)
      • Project and Construction Management
      • Stakeholder Engagement and Social Sustainability
    • Transportation
      Toggle Section
      • Air and Noise
      • Architecture, Interior Design, Landscape Architecture and Urban Design
      • Asset and Facilities Management
      • Aviation
      • Bridges
      • Digital Design
      • Geotechnical
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • Maritime and Coastal Engineering
      • Materials Technology
      • Railways
      • Road Systems
        Toggle Section
        • Pavement Engineering
        • Road Network Management
        • Road Systems
      • Structures
      • Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
      • Stakeholder Engagement and Social Sustainability
      • Tunnels
      • Intelligent Transport Systems
    • Water
      Toggle Section
      • Aquatic Sciences
      • Dams
      • Food and Agriculture
        Toggle Section
        • Agriculture
        • Food Processing
        • Forestry Management
      • Hydrogeology
      • Automation
      • Hydrology and Hydrodynamics
        Toggle Section
        • Climate Change
        • Waterways and Coastal
      • Impact Assessment and Permitting
      • Integrated Water Management
      • International Development Assistance (IDA)
      • Maritime and Coastal Engineering
      • Spatial Sciences
      • Stakeholder Engagement and Social Sustainability
      • Wastewater and Stormwater Collection Systems
      • Wastewater Treatment and Recycling
      • Water Treatment and Desalination
        Toggle Section
        • Desalination
        • Water Treatment
      • Water Transmission and Distribution
      • Construction Contracting
  • About Us
    Toggle Section
    • Community
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Health, Safety and Environment
    • History
      Toggle Section
      • A Firm Foundation
      • Breaking New Ground
    • Integrity Management
    • News and Insights
      Toggle Section
      • Insights
        Toggle Section
        • Water
        • Energy & Resources
        • Environment
        • Property & Buildings
        • Transportation
        • Digital
        • Advisory
        • Project Management
        • Planning for uncertainty
        • Non-revenue water losses
        • Achieving business sustainability
        • Flood Modelling and Water meter Calibration
        • Waste to Energy for Wastewater Treatment
        • Integrated Water Management
        • Resource Recovery from Wastewater
        • Transitioning to customer-centric apporaches
        • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
        • California children affected by lead poisoning
        • Water Recycling Fund Program
        • Upgrading Kangaroo Creek Dam
        • Complying with industrial stormwater planning updates
        • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
        • Filtering microplastics
        • Lead in Drinking Water
        • Permitting for industrial stormwater discharge in Illinois
        • Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP)
        • Water Recycling Fund Program
        • Microgrid in WA
        • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
        • Permitting for industrial stormwater discharge in Illinois
        • Court upholds emission monitoring for oil and gas
        • Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP)
        • Enabling electricity evolution
        • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
        • Infrastructure owners face change
        • Proposed emission reductions for oil and gas
        • Underground storage closure requirements
        • US Congress votes to lift US oil export ban
        • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
        • Managing Outrage
        • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
        • Lead in Drinking Water
        • Proposed emission reductions for oil and gas
        • USEPA intends to expand the Risk Management Program
        • Transforming perspectives on complex sites
        • Complying with chemical data reporting
        • Risk Assessment and Toxicology Update On TSCA Reform
        • Court upholds emission monitoring for oil and gas
        • Benzene Fenceline Monitoring Program
        • California Organics Diversion Regulatory Update
        • California children affected by lead poisoning
        • Change Notification to ISO 14001:2015
        • Task force recommendations for expedited site cleanup
        • Proposed Revisions to Site Remediation MACT
        • New Ontario online registry for environmental permits
        • Federal guidance released for human health risk assessments
        • Revised UST regulations
        • Lead levels updated for remediation
        • Remediation guidance for adaptive site management
        • USEPA intends to expand the Risk Management Program
        • New toxicity values for EPA screening calculator
        • TSCA Reform is on its way to become a law
        • New Strategy for Waste-Free Ontario
        • Final ruling issued on exposure to Crystalline Silica
        • Fill and Excess Soil Regulatory Update
        • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
        • Future of Western Sydney
        • USEPA Vapor Intrusion Technical Guide
        • Hazard awareness training for demolition services
        • Big Data
        • Digital Technologies
        • Virtual Reality Mining Operations
        • Digital Disruption
        • Canada hosts international forum on public private partnerships
        • Public private partnership forum examines lessons for transit
        • Public Private Partnerships in China
        • New Strategy for Waste-Free Ontario
        • Hazard awareness training for demolition services
        • Complying with chemical data reporting
        • Fill and Excess Soil Regulatory Update
        • Project Management for Large Transport Projects
        • Public private partnership forum examines lessons for transit
        • Canada hosts international forum on public private partnerships
        • Transforming perspectives on complex sites
        • Risk Assessment and Toxicology Update On TSCA Reform
        • Critical insights from P3 2017 in Toronto, Canada
      • newsheader
      • News
      • Publications
      • Insights
    • Our leadership
      Toggle Section
      • Our Board
      • Executive Management Group
      • Governance
    • Proud to be employee owned
    • Sustainability
    • Values and Culture
  • Careers
    Toggle Section
    • Opportunities
    • Life@GHD
    • Work@GHD
  • Contact
    Toggle Section
    • Feedback Form
Skip to Content
iCreate Base Site Logo
  • Sectors
    • Energy & Resources
    • Environment
    • Property & Buildings
    • Transportation
    • Water
  • Projects
    • Project Search
  • Services
    • Advisory
    • Architecture and Design
    • Buildings
    • Digital
    • Energy and Resources
    • Environmental
    • Geosciences
    • Project Management
    • Transportation
    • Water
  • About Us
    • Community
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Health, Safety and Environment
    • History
    • Integrity Management
    • News and Insights
    • Our leadership
    • Proud to be employee owned
    • Sustainability
    • Values and Culture
  • Careers
    • Opportunities
    • Life@GHD
    • Work@GHD
  • Contact
    • Feedback Form
Search
Global
Change Your Location
  • Global
  • Australia
  • Canada (English)
  • Canada (français)
  • Chile
  • China
  • Fiji / South Pacific
  • New Zealand
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Philippines
  • Qatar
  • UAE
  • UK
  • United States
  • Awards and Rankings
  • Family of companies
  • Policy Statements
  • Quality Management Systems

Kangaroo Creek Dam Upgrade

Upgrading Kangaroo Creek Dam

HomeNews and InsightsInsightsUpgrading Kangaroo Creek Dam
  • News and Insights
    Toggle Section
    • Insights
      Toggle Section
      • Water
      • Energy & Resources
      • Environment
      • Property & Buildings
      • Transportation
      • Digital
      • Advisory
      • Project Management
      • Planning for uncertainty
      • Non-revenue water losses
      • Achieving business sustainability
      • Flood Modelling and Water meter Calibration
      • Waste to Energy for Wastewater Treatment
      • Integrated Water Management
      • Resource Recovery from Wastewater
      • Transitioning to customer-centric apporaches
      • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
      • California children affected by lead poisoning
      • Water Recycling Fund Program
      • Upgrading Kangaroo Creek Dam
      • Complying with industrial stormwater planning updates
      • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
      • Filtering microplastics
      • Lead in Drinking Water
      • Permitting for industrial stormwater discharge in Illinois
      • Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP)
      • Water Recycling Fund Program
      • Microgrid in WA
      • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
      • Permitting for industrial stormwater discharge in Illinois
      • Court upholds emission monitoring for oil and gas
      • Storm Water Grant Program (SWGP)
      • Enabling electricity evolution
      • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
      • Infrastructure owners face change
      • Proposed emission reductions for oil and gas
      • Underground storage closure requirements
      • US Congress votes to lift US oil export ban
      • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
      • Managing Outrage
      • Groundwater Quality Monitoring at CCR Units
      • Lead in Drinking Water
      • Proposed emission reductions for oil and gas
      • USEPA intends to expand the Risk Management Program
      • Transforming perspectives on complex sites
      • Complying with chemical data reporting
      • Risk Assessment and Toxicology Update On TSCA Reform
      • Court upholds emission monitoring for oil and gas
      • Benzene Fenceline Monitoring Program
      • California Organics Diversion Regulatory Update
      • California children affected by lead poisoning
      • Change Notification to ISO 14001:2015
      • Task force recommendations for expedited site cleanup
      • Proposed Revisions to Site Remediation MACT
      • New Ontario online registry for environmental permits
      • Federal guidance released for human health risk assessments
      • Revised UST regulations
      • Lead levels updated for remediation
      • Remediation guidance for adaptive site management
      • USEPA intends to expand the Risk Management Program
      • New toxicity values for EPA screening calculator
      • TSCA Reform is on its way to become a law
      • New Strategy for Waste-Free Ontario
      • Final ruling issued on exposure to Crystalline Silica
      • Fill and Excess Soil Regulatory Update
      • EPA 2017 Stormwater Construction General Permit
      • Future of Western Sydney
      • USEPA Vapor Intrusion Technical Guide
      • Hazard awareness training for demolition services
      • Big Data
      • Digital Technologies
      • Virtual Reality Mining Operations
      • Digital Disruption
      • Canada hosts international forum on public private partnerships
      • Public private partnership forum examines lessons for transit
      • Public Private Partnerships in China
      • New Strategy for Waste-Free Ontario
      • Hazard awareness training for demolition services
      • Complying with chemical data reporting
      • Fill and Excess Soil Regulatory Update
      • Project Management for Large Transport Projects
      • Public private partnership forum examines lessons for transit
      • Canada hosts international forum on public private partnerships
      • Transforming perspectives on complex sites
      • Risk Assessment and Toxicology Update On TSCA Reform
      • Critical insights from P3 2017 in Toronto, Canada
    • newsheader
    • News
    • Publications
    • Insights
  • Community
  • Diversity and Inclusion
  • Health, Safety and Environment
  • History
    Toggle Section
    • A Firm Foundation
    • Breaking New Ground
  • Integrity Management
  • Our leadership
    Toggle Section
    • Our Board
    • Executive Management Group
    • Governance
  • Proud to be employee owned
  • Sustainability
  • Values and Culture

Interior Banner

Paul Maisano, Water Storage Team Leader for GHD in Victoria, Australia; and Angus Paton, Manager of Asset Management at the South Australian Water Corporation, give details about the upgrading of Kangaroo Creek Dam.

Kangaroo Creek Dam is located on the Torrens River approximately 22km north east of Adelaide, South Australia. It was originally constructed between 1966-69 to provide additional storage for Adelaide's metropolitan water supply, and was later raised and the spillway upgraded in 1983 for the purpose of providing additional flood storage and to reduce flood outflows. The dam is owned and operated by the South Australian Water Corporation (SA Water).

Kangaroo Creek Dam is a concrete face rockfill dam with a side channel spillway as shown in Figure 1. Also included in the design were a grout curtain in the foundation, an inclined reinforced concrete tower with outlet pipework through a tunnel on the right abutment (originally part of the diversion works) and a seepage measuring weir. The dam is currently 63.5m high with a crest length of 138m.

In 1983 the dam was modified to provide a flood mitigation function by reducing the full supply level with the inclusion of two low flow ducts in the original spillway structure and a raising of the ogee crest level on the spillway (see Figure 2). The embankment crest level was also raised through the installation of a reinforced concrete U-shaped structure (see Figure 3).

Repairs were undertaken in 2001 on some of the upstream concrete face slab joints.

Previous safety reviews and a risk assessments identified that the dam does not comply with modern safety standards with respect to flood capacity and structural strength. The dam may be vulnerable to rare strong seismic loading that may cause the perimetric joint and some vertical joints in the upstream face concrete slab to open up below the reservoir level. This would result in leakage into the dam rockfill. Considering the zoning of the dam and the materials used for construction, these leaks might result in saturation of the rockfill and instability and/or unravelling of the downstream slope and failure of the dam. Current Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD) guidelines require the dam to be able to safely pass the Probable Maximum Flood.

GHD was engaged by SA Water to design upgrade works to ensure the dam meets modern standards and complies with relevant ANCOLD Guidelines by providing increased spillway capacity, improved resistance to extreme seismic loading and increased drawdown capacity through the outlet works. The scope of GHD's engagement includes all required investigations and a spillway physical model study.

The main components of the upgrade works include:

  • Raising the embankment height from 63.5m to 69.4m.
  • Extending the concrete face slab.
  • Providing a full height downstream rockfill berm with suitable transition zones.
  • Upgrading the vertical and perimetric joint waterstops.
  • Widening the spillway chute.
  • Extending the eastern ogee crest structure by 40.2m.
  • Raising the spillway walls.
  • Anchoring the existing spillway ogee crest structure.
  • Modifying the outlet works to accommodate the embankment raise and construction of a new seepage measuring weir.

The key challenges faced by the designers have been:

  • Competing requirements to provide a stabilising fill for stability in the event the downstream rockfill becomes fully saturated, and to provide an internal drainage system to reduce potentially high seepage gradients to prevent unravelling of the downstream rockfill;
  • Unfavourable conditions in the spillway training wall foundations for post tensioned anchors, requiring the design to proceed on the basis of raising the walls using gravity sections, with resulting impacts on flow within the spillway chute; and
  • The requirement to maintain the existing Dam Crest Flood capacity at all times during the works which has required the design of three separate cofferdam arrangements.

Geotechnical Investigations

Kangaroo Creek Dam is situated on the western side of the Mount Lofty Ranges which form part of a major mountain chain, including the Flinders Ranges, which extends some 800km inland from the coast near Adelaide. The Kangaroo Creek Dam and reservoir area are underlain by two principal lithologies:

  • Schist, quartz-sericite-feldspar-chlorite, mainly fine grained with a prominent flaky foliation; and
  • Gneiss, quartz-feldspar-sericite, medium to coarse grained, with a prominent flaky foliation, including massive and minor masses of granitic gneiss.

Sandiford (2003) describes the Mount Lofty and Flinders Ranges in South Australia as one of the most seismically active parts of the Australian continent. The Mount Lofty Ranges are bounded by a set of discrete, curvilinear scarps, with four faults on the western range front and three faults on the eastern side of the ranges. It is suggested that these faults have experienced significant Quaternary displacement.

As part of the design work, GHD undertook geological mapping and drilling of eight inclined diamond cored boreholes (total drilled length 255.4m) which included in-situ permeability testing. The results of the borehole drilling indicated unfavourable conditions in the spillway training wall foundations for post tensioned anchors, requiring the design to proceed on the basis of raising the walls using gravity sections. The boreholes also informed the design of the batter slopes for the spillway widening.

Embankment raising

The existing embankment consists of five zones (Zones 1 to 4 are rockfill and Zone 5 is a small amount of alluvium left in place in the central valley section). It has a downstream face batter slope of 1.4H:1V. The embankment raising will require adding a less steep stabilizing berm on the downstream face, removing the existing U-shaped concrete section from the crest and raising the crest level by increasing the embankment height and extending the upstream concrete face slab to the design level, thus providing a freeboard of approximately 1m for the PMF.

The embankment design requirements are based on a postulated post-earthquake scenario assuming the joints and waterstops in the concrete face slab have breached and the design leakage is flowing into the dam body. It is further assumed that the reported "skins" (i.e. broken down rock on the top of the compaction layer) in the downstream rockfill have reduced the permeability of the rockfill so that it is no longer free draining, to the extent that the design leakage has saturated the existing embankment body. This may result in the downstream slope becoming unstable. A stabilising berm is thus required to provide adequate post-earthquake stability under these severe loading conditions.

Conversely, a potential high horizontal permeability (assuming a reduced vertical permeability due to the presence of the reported "skins") may result in erosion of the downstream face if the exiting hydraulic gradient of the leakage flow exceeds the critical gradient. An internal drainage system is required to control the exit flow rate, or the downstream zone modified to prevent unravelling on the downstream face. The design incorporates internal transition zones for drainage with a drainage zone incorporating an outer larger rockfill designed to prevent unravelling. A typical cross section is shown in Figure 4.

The design of the embankment zoning in the raised portion of the embankment was based on the recommendations to control seismic-induced settlement in the upper portion of the embankment contained within Materón and Fernandez (2011). Materón and Fernandez also recommend a flatter downstream slope in the upper portion of the embankment. The 1.7H:1V effective downstream slope adopted for the upper portion of the embankment is significantly flatter than for most CFRDs. Materón and Fernandez also recommend a well graded rockfill material that is well compacted to provide better earthquake resistance in the upper portion of an embankment where ground motions are amplified. The design incorporates a selected rockfill grading for the zone above the top of the existing rockfill to provide the recommended properties for improved seismic resistance.

The internal transition zone consists of a three-layer arrangement, with all the layers being no erosion filters for the adjacent materials. The weighting berm will consist of three different gradings. In the upper portion of the stabilising berm acts solely as weighting fill to the internal transition (filter/drainage) zone. In the lower portion, an extension of the existing drainage zone contains larger rock for improved flow capacity. A 6m wide zone of selected rock of adequate size to prevent unravelling protects this extended drainage zone from both internal leakage exit gradients and from backwater effects when the spillway is operating. The downstream slope of the lower portion of the embankment is significantly flatter at 1:2.25 to meet stability requirements.

The extension of the concrete face slab will be supported on an extruded concrete kerb in line with current practice for CFRDs. A layer of 100mm minus well graded rockfill (similar to Zone 2B in ICOLD Bulletin 141) will be placed adjacent to the kerbs. The design utilises the concrete kerbs as a temporary cofferdam until the face slab extension is completed.

Spillway widening

The required additional spillway capacity will be provided by extending the existing ogee crested structure by 40.2m and excavating a widened spillway chute. Five different computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of the proposed spillway arrangement were analysed. For all arrangements the intent was to retain control on the ogee crest and not to allow control to move into the chute. The end result was an optimised arrangement of a tapered chute that provided the required flow capacity but reduced the volume of rock excavation.

The existing spillway terminal structure is a flip bucket with a plunge pool in the river course. During the course of the design it became apparent that modifying this arrangement to have a plunge pool at the end of the spillway chute could provide cost savings. The design proceeded with the removal of the flip bucket and addition of a plunge pool, with this arrangement being modelled in a physical hydraulic model constructed at the Manly Hydraulics Laboratory. Initial model runs showed unfavourable conditions in the plunge pool at large flows and the decision was made to revert the design back to the original flip bucket arrangement. At the time of writing, the physical modelling of the flip bucket is in the process of being finalised. Figure 5 shows the physical spillway model in operation.

A statistical fracture survey was undertaken on the existing spillway excavation using a scanline mapping methodology. The purpose of this mapping was to identify, assess and document the nature and distribution of rockmass fractures on the spillway excavation slopes. The information collected was used to enable statistical analysis of both fracture characteristics and kinematic behaviour. The end result was the adoption of a 50º batter slope (similar to the existing batter slope) with benches at approximately 15m vertical spacing.

The existing embankment fill is retained on the left abutment by a large gravity concrete wall - referred to as the Left Abutment Block - which also acts as a spillway training wall. Due to the unfavourable conditions for post tensioned anchors, this wall has been designed as a gravity structure. This has necessitated the use of 3-D finite element analysis - both linear and non-linear - to check the stability of the wall under seismic loading. In order to improve the wall's stability against sliding, the design incorporates an anchored thrust beam to transfer loads into the rock batter on the far side of the spillway cutting.

Waterstops

The existing perimetric and vertical face slab joints contain a single PVC waterstop. In line with current practice, the existing joints and the new joints associated with the face slab extension will be protected with external EPDM Omega type waterstops. The extended perimetric joint will have a second line of defence in the form of a copper waterstop, also in line with current practice. Two external waterstop profiles were chosen based on the expected joint openings as a result of earthquake-induced settlement.

Construction

SA Water used a tender process to identify two contractors who were contracted during concept design works for the purpose of:

  • Providing constructability advice to ensure that the final design minimised construction costs.
  • Ensure competition in tendering for the construction.

Constructability was a major concern as excavated material needed to be transported across the spillway and placed on the embankment. The haul road up the downstream face of the embankment will be incorporated into the embankment design and left in place to provide permanent access and a cost saving.  

Nearing completion

Whilst the Kangaroo Creek Dam has performed satisfactorily since the completion of construction, changes to dam safety standards have meant that upgrade works are required to meet current criteria for resistance to seismic loading and flood capacity.

The design of upgrade works is nearing completion with construction work underway in the spillway cutting and also at the downstream toe with the extension of the outlets. At present, the design is focussing on post-tensioned anchors to stabilise the existing ogee crest spillway structure for extreme loads.

 

References

  1. Sandiford, M. (2003). Neotectonics of southeastern Australia: linking the Quaternary faulting record with seismicity and in situ stress. Chapter 8, Geological Society of Australia Special Publication 22, pp 101 - 113.
  2. Trudinger, J. P. (1973). Engineering Geology of the Kangaroo Creek Dam. Department of Mines, Geological Survey of South Australia.
  3. ICOLD (2010) Bulletin 141: Concrete face rockfill dams - Concepts for design and construction.
  4. Considerations on the Seismic Design of High Concrete Face Rockfill Dams (CFRDs), Materón and Fernandez (2011).
Follow Us:
Contact UsNews and InsightsLegal NoticesPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseStaff External ServicesClient Access

Copyright © GHD 2018

Sitemap
Increase Contrast
Top